When evaluating service delivery alternatives, which of the following is NOT considered a stakeholder in the process?

In evaluating service delivery alternatives, stakeholders are individuals or groups that have an interest in or are affected by the decisions made in the process. Elected officials are typically considered key stakeholders because they represent the interests and concerns of their constituents and have a role in policy-making and resource allocation. They influence decisions regarding service delivery based on the needs of the community and can provide funding and support for various initiatives.

In contrast, while advocacy groups, unions, and local businesses can certainly have a vested interest in service delivery outcomes, they are not typically involved in the decision-making process in the same direct manner as elected officials. Advocacy groups might push for specific policy changes, unions might represent workers’ interests, and local businesses may have economic concerns, but the designation of being a stakeholder often implies a formal role or responsibility in the governance process, which is primarily held by elected officials.

Therefore, since elected officials play a significant role in the service delivery evaluation process and often have the authority to make decisions or influence outcomes, they are definitely considered stakeholders in this context. This leads to the conclusion that identifying them as a 'not' stakeholder is an incorrect assertion in this scenario.